In McColl's work (supplementary material no. 17) we see 25 Hungarian La Tène samples, 24 of which have Baltic BA admixture. Of these, at least 5 are at the level of 40-70%.
So it's not a coincidence. There has simply took place a population flow between Poland and Pannonia since the Bronze Age, as seen in the division of IBD segments from Ralph's work and Cassidy's work.
Distance to: HungaryMiddleTisza_AvarPeriod:RKF183
0.02039666 Hungarian
0.02100703 Croatian
0.02500316 Slovenian
0.02552174 Austrian
0.02842506 Ukrainian_Zakarpattia
0.02878348 Czech
0.02889017 German_Erlangen
0.02951119 Bosnian
0.03038727 German_East
0.03330135 Moldovan
0.03423608 Serbian
0.03432276 German
0.03473938 Slovakian
0.03487904 Ukrainian_Lviv
0.03568972 German_Hamburg
0.03755259 Montenegrin
0.03771749 Moldovan_o
0.03781927 Polish_Silesian
0.04140453 Polish
0.04142515 French_Alsace
0.04234225 Sorb_Niederlausitz
0.04267194 French_Seine-Maritime
0.04295870 Romanian
0.04337243 Afrikaner
0.04347821 BelgianA
Pribislav wrote:
"RKF106 is definitely L1029. He has two derived SNPs at L1029 level, AMM269/S4546/Z2938+ T>C (3C) and AMM272/S4548/Z2954+ C>A (1A). The only derived SNP I could find below L1029 is BY82719+ at L1029>YP416>Y348628 level, but it is a C>T transition covered with only one read. YP416 isn't covered."
if true then RKF 106 is now the second oldest L1029 after Wielbark Czarnowko
unfortunatly with no absolute-date but he is assigned to the EA
the pedigree with RKF 183 is really interesting since he also gets assigned to the EA and usually the premise is that the Slavs came along with the Avars thus a timely gettogether and judging by the modern ref maps the common maternal side doesnt really look to be from any other place than 106 himself; so with 183 being I1a(L22) from which local/pre-avar group could his paternal side be from ? the Gepid_P group atleast proved I1a rich in the TT and his qpAdm goes in favor for Lon_P_north vs Sarm_P, might be a hint with whom the 106 family mingled with; a connection to Wielbark times is prob too far out
both have the same assemblage of iron buckles and iron knife, though 183 must have had a higher standing (smthing to do with horses) given his iron stirrups; acc to Schmid the buckles at the site are either simple iron types 1a-1b or more elaborate avar/steppe style bronze types 3-6b; the iron-knife attached to one of the belts was used as a tool acc to Schmid
04-29-2024, 04:51 AM (This post was last modified: 04-29-2024, 05:44 AM by Radko.)
Unveiling Hunnic Legacy: Decoding Elite Presence in Poland through a Unique Child's Burial with Modified Cranium
This study presents a double burial from Czulice indicating elements of the Hunnic culture. Individual I, aged 7-9, and Individual II, aged 8-9 with a skull deformation, were both genetically identified as boys. Individual II, who exhibited genetic markers of Asian ancestry, was equipped with gold and silver items. In contrast, Individual I displayed European ancestry. The application of strontium isotope analysis shed light on the origins of the individuals. Individual I was non-local, while Individual II was identified as a local, but also falling within the range commonly associated with the Pannonian Plain. Stable isotope analysis suggested a diet consisting of inland resources. Through radiocarbon dating, this burial was determined to date back to the years 395-418 CE, making it the earliest grave of its kind discovered in Poland. The analyses have provided new insights into the nature of the relationship between the Huns and the local inhabitants.
(04-29-2024, 04:51 AM)Radko Wrote: Unveiling Hunnic Legacy: Decoding Elite Presence in Poland through a Unique Child's Burial with Modified Cranium
This study presents a double burial from Czulice indicating elements of the Hunnic culture. Individual I, aged 7-9, and Individual II, aged 8-9 with a skull deformation, were both genetically identified as boys. Individual II, who exhibited genetic markers of Asian ancestry, was equipped with gold and silver items. In contrast, Individual I displayed European ancestry. The application of strontium isotope analysis shed light on the origins of the individuals. Individual I was non-local, while Individual II was identified as a local, but also falling within the range commonly associated with the Pannonian Plain. Stable isotope analysis suggested a diet consisting of inland resources. Through radiocarbon dating, this burial was determined to date back to the years 395-418 CE, making it the earliest grave of its kind discovered in Poland. The analyses have provided new insights into the nature of the relationship between the Huns and the local inhabitants.
04-29-2024, 07:40 AM (This post was last modified: 04-29-2024, 08:56 AM by Orentil.)
A Gepid or Herulian boy? (if it is true that the Visigoths and East Goths already showed major shifts at that time). I assume an IBD analysis would rather group him to EastScand then SouthScand.
PS: Maybe a hostage boy of a Germanic elite family at a Hunnic court (see posts below) in Southern Poland, dying together with his Hunnic friend, very interesting find
04-29-2024, 08:10 AM (This post was last modified: 04-29-2024, 08:14 AM by Orentil.)
Has anybody more archaeological information about this double burial? Interestingly Czulice is just 34 km away from the grave in Jakuszowice: "More than a half of Early Migration Period Nomadic Finds (pp. 370 –410) by Judyta Rodzińska-Nowak deals with the ‘princely’ grave found at Jakuszowice near Cracow in 1911, but only now submitted to an all-embracing study, including metallographic analyses. She confirms Godłowski’s dating of the burial to the thirties of the fifth century, just before Attila’s reign, but leaves open the question of identity of the frail youth buried with his horse six metres below the ground with an inventory of weapons, ornaments, and horse trappings which, though sorely incomplete due to the circumstances of the discovery, match the contemporary ‘royal’ burials and sacrificial deposits of the Carpathian Basin: a member of the uppermost Hunnic élite or a scion of the local ruling family subordinated to the Huns? Be that as it may, this find (plus most probably the nearby inhumation grave of a warrior with deformed skull equipped with a Hunnic seax at Przemęczany) shows that in the second quarter of the fifth century the south-eastern pocket of the Przeworsk Culture was a part of the Hunnic empire." (Ziolkowski, Pollen, brooches, solidi and Restgermanen or todays Poland during the migration period)
(04-29-2024, 08:10 AM)Orentil Wrote: Has anybody more archaeological information about this double burial? Interestingly Czulice is just 34 km away from the grave in Jakuszowice: "More than a half of Early Migration Period Nomadic Finds (pp. 370 –410) by Judyta Rodzińska-Nowak deals with the ‘princely’ grave found at Jakuszowice near Cracow in 1911, but only now submitted to an all-embracing study, including metallographic analyses. She confirms Godłowski’s dating of the burial to the thirties of the fifth century, just before Attila’s reign, but leaves open the question of identity of the frail youth buried with his horse six metres below the ground with an inventory of weapons, ornaments, and horse trappings which, though sorely incomplete due to the circumstances of the discovery, match the contemporary ‘royal’ burials and sacrificial deposits of the Carpathian Basin: a member of the uppermost Hunnic élite or a scion of the local ruling family subordinated to the Huns? Be that as it may, this find (plus most probably the nearby inhumation grave of a warrior with deformed skull equipped with a Hunnic seax at Przemęczany) shows that in the second quarter of the fifth century the south-eastern pocket of the Przeworsk Culture was a part of the Hunnic empire." (Ziolkowski, Pollen, brooches, solidi and Restgermanen or todays Poland during the migration period)
Interestingly, Early Avar CSB-9 sample is on Vyazov's "Slavic" IBD sharing graph.
CSB-9: Grave No. 9 (Early Avar period):
The remains of an adult female were found at a depth of 118 cm. The E-W oriented grave pit was 59-47 cm wide and 211 cm long. Both hands of the deceased rested on the pelvis. An iron buckle was found here, while earrings with a spherical pendant were found around the temporal bone. A fragment of a dished grey ceramic vessel was also recovered from the grave. The burial can be dated to the Early Avar period based on the earrings and the orientation.
(04-29-2024, 04:51 AM)Radko Wrote: Unveiling Hunnic Legacy: Decoding Elite Presence in Poland through a Unique Child's Burial with Modified Cranium
This study presents a double burial from Czulice indicating elements of the Hunnic culture. Individual I, aged 7-9, and Individual II, aged 8-9 with a skull deformation, were both genetically identified as boys. Individual II, who exhibited genetic markers of Asian ancestry, was equipped with gold and silver items. In contrast, Individual I displayed European ancestry. The application of strontium isotope analysis shed light on the origins of the individuals. Individual I was non-local, while Individual II was identified as a local, but also falling within the range commonly associated with the Pannonian Plain. Stable isotope analysis suggested a diet consisting of inland resources. Through radiocarbon dating, this burial was determined to date back to the years 395-418 CE, making it the earliest grave of its kind discovered in Poland. The analyses have provided new insights into the nature of the relationship between the Huns and the local inhabitants.
04-29-2024, 12:27 PM (This post was last modified: 04-29-2024, 12:31 PM by alexfritz.)
(04-29-2024, 07:40 AM)Orentil Wrote: A Gepid or Herulian boy? (if it is true that the Visigoths and East Goths already showed major shifts at that time). I assume an IBD analysis would rather group him to EastScand then SouthScand.
PS: Maybe a hostage boy of a Germanic elite family at a Hunnic court (see posts below) in Southern Poland, dying together with his Hunnic friend, very interesting find
the odd question is why were both dead and buried at the same age
as i understand the abstract, Ind II "who exhibited genetic markers of Asian ancestry" was buried with gold and silver along with having ACD; a symbol of elitism among the steppe/Hun people and later adopted by its vassals (cf (low-cov) Osijek 5th c.); but neither is mentioned for Ind I; however a constellation in which Ind I was a servant of Ind II and thus buried along is i think hinging on the fact that both were the same age and thus Ind I could not have been much of a servant in such a constellation; hostage is a good call
eitherway Ind I must be from a location non-local to the lower Vistula area and maybe that already qualifies him to the group (?Vandals) of earlier DA119 from Poprad; however given the calCE timerange and the age of both the burial coincides with the times of the Rhinecrossing in 406 CE which was most prob caused by the Huns crossing into the middle Danube area; unless a remnant of groups like Poprad DA119 stayed behind Ind I could be non-local in the sense from Hun subjugations further east and by said time (must fall to Uldin's reign) the Greuthungi, Skiri and Heruli were def already subjugated and made vassals by the Huns
04-29-2024, 02:57 PM (This post was last modified: 04-29-2024, 03:01 PM by Orentil.)
(04-29-2024, 12:27 PM)alexfritz Wrote:
(04-29-2024, 07:40 AM)Orentil Wrote: A Gepid or Herulian boy? (if it is true that the Visigoths and East Goths already showed major shifts at that time). I assume an IBD analysis would rather group him to EastScand then SouthScand.
PS: Maybe a hostage boy of a Germanic elite family at a Hunnic court (see posts below) in Southern Poland, dying together with his Hunnic friend, very interesting find
the odd question is why were both dead and buried at the same age
as i understand the abstract, Ind II "who exhibited genetic markers of Asian ancestry" was buried with gold and silver along with having ACD; a symbol of elitism among the steppe/Hun people and later adopted by its vassals (cf (low-cov) Osijek 5th c.); but neither is mentioned for Ind I; however a constellation in which Ind I was a servant of Ind II and thus buried along is i think hinging on the fact that both were the same age and thus Ind I could not have been much of a servant in such a constellation; hostage is a good call
eitherway Ind I must be from a location non-local to the lower Vistula area and maybe that already qualifies him to the group (?Vandals) of earlier DA119 from Poprad; however given the calCE timerange and the age of both the burial coincides with the times of the Rhinecrossing in 406 CE which was most prob caused by the Huns crossing into the middle Danube area; unless a remnant of groups like Poprad DA119 stayed behind Ind I could be non-local in the sense from Hun subjugations further east and by said time (must fall to Uldin's reign) the Greuthungi, Skiri and Heruli were def already subjugated and made vassals by the Huns
04-29-2024, 08:33 PM (This post was last modified: 04-29-2024, 08:39 PM by Radko.)
"Ancient DNA reveals networks of Biological relatedness among the Central European societies in the second half of the first millennium" by Denisa Zlamalova (it starts at ~29:00) - https://www.facebook.com/share/v/CKnrhz7zmpNqbY5j/