03-24-2024, 11:58 AM
(03-23-2024, 06:50 PM)ambron Wrote: As for the Wielbark population, McColl's team is very enigmatic about it:So Goths had Balto-Slavic-like admix almost right from the beginning, even in Scandinavia?
"The earliest individuals from Wielbark, Poland (~1900 BP) are primarily of Eastern Scandinavian ancestry, supporting a population migration from a region and population distinct from that of the West and North Germanic populations, a scenario potentially consistent with Gothic oral history."
This applies only to a few of the Wielbark samples included in the study - the earliest ones (approx. 100 AD) and those with the most Scandinavian genetics. Unfortunately, the authors nowhere present an analysis of the admixtures of the Wielbark Goths, although they do present the Iberian and Crimean Goths.
Fortunately, the authors place the Wielbark Goths on the IBD segment division maps. And here, on the first map in the first row from attachment 14, we can see that about 30 Wielbark individuals draw their ancestors from the Baltic BA source. The Wielbark population draws approximately the same amount of ancestry from the Baltic BA source as the Late Antique population of Öland, which is known (attachment 17) to have a relatively high share of the Baltic BA component. The Wielbark population from McColl's work therefore has a clear Eastern European admixture, the same as in Stolarek's work.