Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.

Check for new replies
Stolarek et al: Genetic history of East-Central Europe...
(3 hours ago)Radko Wrote:
(6 hours ago)Nógarðar Wrote: Somogyvár-Vinkovci culture:
> Somogyvár-Vinkovci culture: > ERS16293360 [S9] R-M417* 2560-2290 calBCE

The sample was also checked by Pribislav and he confirmed it's a basal R-M417* (and not R-CTS1211).

[Image: S9.png]

S9 on PCA:

[Image: S9.png]

MBA similarity map:

[Image: HUN-Balatonkeresztur-EBA-S9-2425-MBA.png]

modern similarity map:

[Image: HUN-Balatonkeresztur-EBA-S9-2425.png]
alexfritz, Radko, Orentil And 1 others like this post
Reply
(6 hours ago)Nógarðar Wrote: [...] and while CTS1211 was found already earlier (eg Somogyvár–Vinkovci culture) 

Somogyvár-Vinkovci culture:
> Somogyvár-Vinkovci culture: > ERS16293360 [S9] R-M417* 2560-2290 calBCE
Somogyvár-Vinkovci culture:

> ERS16293360 [S9] R-M417 2560-2290 calBCE

took the info from the paper (Table1) S9 R1a-V2670
though in supp S1 the sample is indeed not listed as CTS1211>V2670 but as M512>>M417>>Z280>>? or ISOGG 14.255 as R1a1a1b1a2~ (S466/Z280)

so he does get downstream of M417 to Z280
leonardo and ambron like this post
Reply
S9 has no significance in the context of the Slavic CTS1211 lines anyway.

What is important, however, is that probably no significant, typically Polish line of CTS1211 can be derived from the Kiev culture.
Reply

Check for new replies

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: Pribislav, 5 Guest(s)