Posts: 104
Threads: 5
Joined: Oct 2023
01-24-2024, 11:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-24-2024, 11:49 PM by teepean.)
Looks like Theytree decided hoe004 and hoe005 were male.
Code:
Sample name hoe004
AU number AU72189
Sample Type Ancient
Reference assembly hg19 / GRCh37
Y-haplogroup R-TY495636
Code:
Sample name hoe005
AU number AU72188
Sample Type Ancient
Reference assembly hg19 / GRCh37
Y-haplogroup R-TY495636
Posts: 323
Threads: 8
Joined: Oct 2023
I guess they just copy/pasted the info without further verifications.
Posts: 104
Threads: 5
Joined: Oct 2023
(01-25-2024, 03:46 AM)TanTin Wrote: I guess they just copy/pasted the info without further verifications.
Looks like the named a new terminal SNP R-TY495636.
TanTin and
old europe like this post
Posts: 323
Threads: 8
Joined: Oct 2023
Who should we trust, the new tree structure (
https://www.theytree.com/tree/R-TY495636) , or to accept these are females ?
Capsian20 and
old europe like this post
Posts: 1,280
Threads: 63
Joined: Sep 2023
Gender: Male
Ethnicity: British
Y-DNA (P): R-FGC36981
Y-DNA (M): R-FT418639
mtDNA (M): U5a2c3a
mtDNA (P): K1a1
Evidently they have two X chromosomes, which makes them females.
Let us now praise famous men, and our fathers that begat us.
- Wisdom of Sirach 44:1
Posts: 498
Threads: 15
Joined: Sep 2023
Gender: Male
Ethnicity: North Sealandic
Nationality: Middle North-American
Y-DNA (P): S28>S139>S485>S211>S257
Y-DNA (M): I2a2a1b2a1b1>Y4925
mtDNA (M): H1bt
mtDNA (P): H37
(01-25-2024, 11:50 PM)rmstevens2 Wrote: Evidently they have two X chromosomes, which makes them females.
Yeah but they identified as males.
I'm gonna get banned lol
U152>L2>Z49>Z142>Z150>FGC12381>FGC12378>FGC47869>FGC12401>FGC47875>FGC12384
50% English, 15% Welsh, 15% Scot/Ulster Scot, 5% Irish, 10% German, 2% Scandi, 2% French & Dutch), 1% India
Ancient ~40% Anglo-Saxon, ~40% Briton/Insular Celt, ~15% German, 4% Other Euro
600 AD: 55% Anglo-Saxon (CNE), 45% Pre-Anglo-Saxon Briton (WBI)
“Be more concerned with seeking the truth than winning an argument”
Posts: 51
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2023
01-26-2024, 06:46 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-26-2024, 06:48 AM by GHurier.)
(01-25-2024, 09:53 PM)TanTin Wrote: Who should we trust, the new tree structure ( https://www.theytree.com/tree/R-TY495636) , or to accept these are females ?
TheYtree is not very carefull about this.
They also still have BOY014 listed as J-M205 despite the sample being known as female aswell.
For this case, it is fairly clear, we have Mesolithic samples with a proposed ~2500-1000 BCE clade.
Their admixture is consistent with Mesolithic populations and not with Bronze-age/Iron-age populations, therefore it is not a datation-issue.
Thus, either this is wrong or it is a proof that time travel exists.
