I mentioned the
Late Antiquity-Early Middle Ages cemetery in the Eastern Italian Alps (Vinschgau/Venosta)thread/study where the published raw data seems to create difficulty for interpretation (both Y and admixture).
So far I did not see the following study:
Archaeological questions and genetic answers:
Male paternal kinship in a copper age multiple burial from the eastern Italian Alps (Auer/Ora, Unterland/Upper Adige)
Paladin et al Aug. 2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2023.104103
So two Y-DNA G2a2b2a1a1b1 (ISOGG, 2019)
One mtDNA J1c + 16261 + 189 (Ind. A , Mol. ID 3058, son? younger?)
G-CTS9737/etc*(xCTS8701,S24652)
One mtDNA K1a (Ind. B, Mol. ID 3059, father? older?)
G-Z3205/etc*(xZ6900,Y19947)
genome coverage 0.07 X for Ind. A and 0.34 X for Ind. B
Copper Age (Ind. A: LTL-3607A 4279 ± 45 BP,
3021–2705 cal. BC [95.4%]; Ind. B: LTL-3607A 4268 ± 35 BP,
3008–2707 cal. BC [95.4%]
Four FASTQ files for shotgun and capture generated in this study available at the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA)
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB58428
I will try if I'm able to extract anything mainly regarding Y-DNA/BAM or for atDNA