Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.

Coming Soon: Y-DNA Haplogroups for Family Finder
#61
(12-03-2023, 05:42 AM)AimSmall Wrote: I've yet to see any haplogroups assigned via autosomal tests.

Same here.
Riverman and rmstevens2 like this post
Reply
#62
(12-03-2023, 12:14 PM)leonardo Wrote:
(12-03-2023, 05:42 AM)AimSmall Wrote: I've yet to see any haplogroups assigned via autosomal tests.

Same here.

Ditto.
Let us now praise famous men, and our fathers that begat us.

- Wisdom of Sirach 44:1
Reply
#63
Mmm I think I've seen several that are called "N/A" in the relative list but do show a haplogroup when you click on their profile.
rmstevens2 likes this post
Reply
#64
I found two FF matches just now who have R-DF13 listed as their Y-DNA haplogroup, apparently via the Family Finder test, since one of them still has "N/A" for his Y-DNA haplogroup in my list of matches. I see that he is DF13 by clicking on his name.

Okay, and I now find eight who have R-L21 listed, including one who still has that "N/A" on my matches list.

Needless to say, R-L21 and R-DF13 are better than R-M269, but they're not that informative. None of these folks has my surname though.
Manofthehour, Riverman, Mitchell-Atkins And 2 others like this post
Let us now praise famous men, and our fathers that begat us.

- Wisdom of Sirach 44:1
Reply
#65
On 23andme my haplogroup was R-U152. I had seen relatives which were narrowed down to L2, Z142, L20 etc... but I suppose it's understandable because L2 (and especially those branches of L2) are more common U152 branches than Z56. I suppose this factor influences how "deep" one's "intermediate haplogroup" is.
ArmandoR1b and rmstevens2 like this post
U152>Z56>Z43>Z46>Z48>Z44>CTS8949>FTC82256 Lindeman
M222...>DF105>ZZ87>S588>S7814 Toner 
Reply
#66
(12-04-2023, 03:53 PM)Manofthehour Wrote: On 23andme my haplogroup was R-U152. I had seen relatives which were narrowed down to L2, Z142, L20 etc... but I suppose it's understandable because L2 (and especially those branches of L2) are more common U152 branches than Z56. I suppose this factor influences how "deep" one's "intermediate haplogroup" is.

I got a more downstream assignement at 23andMe after I had updated to the newest chip version. The chip version seems to make a difference.
rmstevens2 likes this post
Reply
#67
(12-04-2023, 04:09 PM)Riverman Wrote:
(12-04-2023, 03:53 PM)Manofthehour Wrote: On 23andme my haplogroup was R-U152. I had seen relatives which were narrowed down to L2, Z142, L20 etc... but I suppose it's understandable because L2 (and especially those branches of L2) are more common U152 branches than Z56. I suppose this factor influences how "deep" one's "intermediate haplogroup" is.

I got a more downstream assignement at 23andMe after I had updated to the newest chip version. The chip version seems to make a difference.

Mine is V5, which I think is the latest.
rmstevens2 likes this post
U152>Z56>Z43>Z46>Z48>Z44>CTS8949>FTC82256 Lindeman
M222...>DF105>ZZ87>S588>S7814 Toner 
Reply
#68
(12-04-2023, 05:02 PM)Manofthehour Wrote:
(12-04-2023, 04:09 PM)Riverman Wrote:
(12-04-2023, 03:53 PM)Manofthehour Wrote: On 23andme my haplogroup was R-U152. I had seen relatives which were narrowed down to L2, Z142, L20 etc... but I suppose it's understandable because L2 (and especially those branches of L2) are more common U152 branches than Z56. I suppose this factor influences how "deep" one's "intermediate haplogroup" is.

I got a more downstream assignement at 23andMe after I had updated to the newest chip version. The chip version seems to make a difference.

Mine is V5, which I think is the latest.

Yes, its the latest.
Manofthehour and rmstevens2 like this post
Reply
#69
I'm not sure what at 23andMe determines how much Y-DNA resolution you get. Mine is not very common among 23andMe customers, but it's relatively far up the tree from the root.

[Image: R-Z18021-at-23and-Me.jpg]
Manofthehour, Capsian20, Jalisciense like this post
Let us now praise famous men, and our fathers that begat us.

- Wisdom of Sirach 44:1
Reply
#70
(12-04-2023, 10:03 PM)rmstevens2 Wrote: I'm not sure what at 23andMe determines how much Y-DNA resolution you get. Mine is not very common among 23andMe customers, but it's relatively far up the tree from the root.

[Image: R-Z18021-at-23and-Me.jpg]

Is your subclade uncommon ?
rmstevens2 likes this post
Target: CapsianWGS_scaled
Distance: 1.2510% / 0.01251049
37.2 Iberomaurusian
36.8 Early_European_Farmer
12.8 Early_Levantine_Farmer
8.0 Steppe_Pastoralist
4.8 SSA
0.4 Iran_Neolithic
FTDNA : 91% North Africa +<2% Bedouin + <2  Southern-Levantinfo + <1 Sephardic Jewish + 3% Malta +  3%  Iberian Peninsula
23andME :  100% North Africa

WGS ( Y-DNA and mtDNA)
Y-DNA: E-A30032< A30480 ~1610 CE
mtDNA: V25b 800CE ? ( age mtDNA not accurate )
Reply
#71
My Y-DNA is uncommon , I'm happy and sad sometimes about this lol
   
Jalisciense, Riverman, rmstevens2 like this post
Target: CapsianWGS_scaled
Distance: 1.2510% / 0.01251049
37.2 Iberomaurusian
36.8 Early_European_Farmer
12.8 Early_Levantine_Farmer
8.0 Steppe_Pastoralist
4.8 SSA
0.4 Iran_Neolithic
FTDNA : 91% North Africa +<2% Bedouin + <2  Southern-Levantinfo + <1 Sephardic Jewish + 3% Malta +  3%  Iberian Peninsula
23andME :  100% North Africa

WGS ( Y-DNA and mtDNA)
Y-DNA: E-A30032< A30480 ~1610 CE
mtDNA: V25b 800CE ? ( age mtDNA not accurate )
Reply
#72
(12-04-2023, 10:43 PM)Capsian20 Wrote: My Y-DNA is uncommon , I'm happy and sad sometimes about this lol

Yours is more common than mine, at least at 23andMe, since yours occurs in 1 out of every 1,300 customers at 23andMe, and mine in just 1 out of every 8,900.

Mine is fairly far up the tree from the root, so that is to be expected. The farther up the tree you go, the fewer people share that haplogroup, because it has had less time to expand.
Riverman and Capsian20 like this post
Let us now praise famous men, and our fathers that begat us.

- Wisdom of Sirach 44:1
Reply
#73
(12-04-2023, 10:53 PM)rmstevens2 Wrote:
(12-04-2023, 10:43 PM)Capsian20 Wrote: My Y-DNA is uncommon , I'm happy and sad sometimes about this lol

Yours is more common than mine, at least at 23andMe, since yours occurs in 1 out of every 1,300 customers at 23andMe, and mine in just 1 out of every 8,900.

Mine is fairly far up the tree from the root, so that is to be expected. The farther up the tree you go, the fewer people share that haplogroup, because it has had less time to expand.

What is your TMRCA with others subclades ?
Target: CapsianWGS_scaled
Distance: 1.2510% / 0.01251049
37.2 Iberomaurusian
36.8 Early_European_Farmer
12.8 Early_Levantine_Farmer
8.0 Steppe_Pastoralist
4.8 SSA
0.4 Iran_Neolithic
FTDNA : 91% North Africa +<2% Bedouin + <2  Southern-Levantinfo + <1 Sephardic Jewish + 3% Malta +  3%  Iberian Peninsula
23andME :  100% North Africa

WGS ( Y-DNA and mtDNA)
Y-DNA: E-A30032< A30480 ~1610 CE
mtDNA: V25b 800CE ? ( age mtDNA not accurate )
Reply
#74
(12-04-2023, 11:14 PM)Capsian20 Wrote:
(12-04-2023, 10:53 PM)rmstevens2 Wrote:
(12-04-2023, 10:43 PM)Capsian20 Wrote: My Y-DNA is uncommon , I'm happy and sad sometimes about this lol

Yours is more common than mine, at least at 23andMe, since yours occurs in 1 out of every 1,300 customers at 23andMe, and mine in just 1 out of every 8,900.

Mine is fairly far up the tree from the root, so that is to be expected. The farther up the tree you go, the fewer people share that haplogroup, because it has had less time to expand.

What is your TMRCA with others subclades ?

That depends on where you go on the tree.
Capsian20 likes this post
Let us now praise famous men, and our fathers that begat us.

- Wisdom of Sirach 44:1
Reply
#75
(12-04-2023, 11:29 PM)rmstevens2 Wrote:
(12-04-2023, 11:14 PM)Capsian20 Wrote:
(12-04-2023, 10:53 PM)rmstevens2 Wrote:
(12-04-2023, 10:43 PM)Capsian20 Wrote: My Y-DNA is uncommon , I'm happy and sad sometimes about this lol

Yours is more common than mine, at least at 23andMe, since yours occurs in 1 out of every 1,300 customers at 23andMe, and mine in just 1 out of every 8,900.

Mine is fairly far up the tree from the root, so that is to be expected. The farther up the tree you go, the fewer people share that haplogroup, because it has had less time to expand.

What is your TMRCA with others subclades ?

That depends on where you go on the tree.

Well you are more lucky than me 
       
Dewsloth likes this post
Target: CapsianWGS_scaled
Distance: 1.2510% / 0.01251049
37.2 Iberomaurusian
36.8 Early_European_Farmer
12.8 Early_Levantine_Farmer
8.0 Steppe_Pastoralist
4.8 SSA
0.4 Iran_Neolithic
FTDNA : 91% North Africa +<2% Bedouin + <2  Southern-Levantinfo + <1 Sephardic Jewish + 3% Malta +  3%  Iberian Peninsula
23andME :  100% North Africa

WGS ( Y-DNA and mtDNA)
Y-DNA: E-A30032< A30480 ~1610 CE
mtDNA: V25b 800CE ? ( age mtDNA not accurate )
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 161 Guest(s)