An attempt at deep West Eurasian phylogeny

[Kale]

Please be patient and more tolerant all of you guys.
Kale is the one who started this discussion. We have it since AG forum, then it was in the previos version before we moved here.  So let Kale to decide who should be moderated and who may contribute.  G25 allows us to do some visualization. I can do similar visualization by using other tools.  So I have some idea what archi is trying to show us, but the way he is doing it is not much satisfactory. So I understand PopGenist82   too.

Yes, patience is important, but like you said, it's not what Archi is doing, it's completely fine to post things you think are correct, even if they turn out not to be, it's his attitude, which I think everyone has exhausted their patience for.

IMO the affinity lies between Dzudzuana & Bacho MUP, via a 'West Eurasian' group which is parallel to but not from Kostenki/ Sunghir.
In other words, the recently hypothesised 'proto-Gravettian migration' is not from Eastern Europe, but southeastern Europe. 

Bacho MUP then contributes to Vestonice Gravettians, as do the Kostenki/Sunghir group.

add. something like this

That's a rather interesting graph. Kostenki/Sunghir have no special relation other than lacking the IUP admix.
I'd be interested to see how Muierii fits in there, if it doesn't break that could prove a promising option.