10-18-2023, 11:13 PM
Howdy all,
Figured I'd dig in and do some work for my first thread on the new forum. Hopefully this stimulates some discussion.
I'd really like to hear the opinions of those more well versed in paleolithic archaeology than myself (so pretty much everyone).
The product of my endeavor is a rather monstrous qpgraph, including 24 populations...
Mbuti
ZlatyKun
Ust_Ishim
BachoKiro_IUP
China_UP (Tianyuan & AR33k)
Onge_Jarawa (modern Onge, modern Jarawa, and Andaman_100BP)
Jomon
RUS_Primorsky_N (DevilsCave & Boisman)
Goyet_Fournol (GoyetQ116_1 & FRL006)
Yana
MA1
Muierii1
Kostenki14
Sunghir
BachoKiro_BK1653
Gravettian (KremsWA, Vestonice, Paglicci, Ostuni)
Peru_RioUncallane_1800BP
Georgia_UP (NEO283 & Dzudzuana)
Italy_WHG (GrottaContinenza, AreneCandide, San Teodoro, Oriente, Grotta del Uzzo 5054)
Pinarbasi
IBM (Taforalt & Morocco_Epipaleolithic OUB002)
Iran_N (GanjDareh, Wezmeh, TepeAbdulHosein)
EHG (Arkhangelsk, Sidelkino, and the early Minino individuals)
CHG
Attached to this post you should find a zip file containing
- Graph.SVG, open that in your browser to view the graph
- Dotfile and edgelist for the qgraph
- A text document and excel sheet that both contain the same information regarding residual stats
- Normal.PNG, a plot showing the distribution of the residuals and testing that distribution for normality (it appears to pass, which coupled with the worst F3 residual being z = 2.01, supposes to me all affinities are adequately accounted for)
To try and summarize the important and/or unexpected takeaways...
The first X node represents Neanderthal ancestry (for BachoKiro_IUP) and Neanderthal and/or damage in BachoKiro_BK1653
ZlatyKun = branches in between basal Eurasians and crown Eurasians, a dead end or a direct ancestor of crown Eurasians?
Goyet_Fournol = a mix of Ust-Ishim and something occupying a similar position to BachoKiro_IUP
'Kostenki-cluster' = a mix of Goyet related ancestry and basal.
ANE = Kostenki-cluster + a generic sort of East-Eurasian (Yana has some Tianyuan on top)
East-Asians (Jomon/Primorsky) = Onge-related lineage + Tianyuan
Near-East = after mixing into the Kostenki-cluster, Basal becomes mixed with the Onge-related lineage that contributes to East-Asians
Georgia_UP = a mixture of the above BE/East-Asian mix and Muierii1
Pinbarbasi = Georgia_UP-like but with 10% WHG
Iran_N = baseline is BE/East-Asian mix, with some ANE and Pinarbasi
CHG = Iran_N but with more Pinarbasi and some EHG
Taforalt = a mix of ANA, proto-Pinarbasi (before the WHG), and 'Levantine Aurignacian', a Goyet-related population that presumably passed through SE Europe 'Balkan Arignacian?', and that also proves crucial in BK1653 and WHG. I do remember reading about a late surivial of Aurignacian technology in Greece, maybe that is related.
WHG = Gravettian + 'Balkan-Aurignacian' + Georgia_UP + ANE
EHG = WHG + Pinarbasi + para-Native-American (UKY, Kolyma, etc.)
Note that in especially the real early branching and in East Eurasians, where we have so few samples, there are multiple phylogenies that work, I just picked the one that made most sense to me.
The following 7 images attempt to illustrate on a map, and through time, what is happening on the graph. Black lines more or less represent regular branching and drift, red and blue lines indicate admixture sources, purple lines indicate the post-admix population. Green lines indicate drift not occuring over distance, but over time - a period of geographic standstill which drift occurred. The colors on the 15kbp slide don't mean much, I got tired and just drew arrows because there are 3 way mixes going on.
The 7 time periods are roughly, 1) pre-40k, 2) post-CI Eruption, 3) 35kbp, 4) 30kbp, 5) LGM-onset, 6) post-LGM, 7) 15kbp
[attachment=109]
[attachment=111]
[attachment=113]
[attachment=115]
[attachment=117]
[attachment=118]
[attachment=120]
[attachment=107]
Figured I'd dig in and do some work for my first thread on the new forum. Hopefully this stimulates some discussion.
I'd really like to hear the opinions of those more well versed in paleolithic archaeology than myself (so pretty much everyone).
The product of my endeavor is a rather monstrous qpgraph, including 24 populations...
Mbuti
ZlatyKun
Ust_Ishim
BachoKiro_IUP
China_UP (Tianyuan & AR33k)
Onge_Jarawa (modern Onge, modern Jarawa, and Andaman_100BP)
Jomon
RUS_Primorsky_N (DevilsCave & Boisman)
Goyet_Fournol (GoyetQ116_1 & FRL006)
Yana
MA1
Muierii1
Kostenki14
Sunghir
BachoKiro_BK1653
Gravettian (KremsWA, Vestonice, Paglicci, Ostuni)
Peru_RioUncallane_1800BP
Georgia_UP (NEO283 & Dzudzuana)
Italy_WHG (GrottaContinenza, AreneCandide, San Teodoro, Oriente, Grotta del Uzzo 5054)
Pinarbasi
IBM (Taforalt & Morocco_Epipaleolithic OUB002)
Iran_N (GanjDareh, Wezmeh, TepeAbdulHosein)
EHG (Arkhangelsk, Sidelkino, and the early Minino individuals)
CHG
Attached to this post you should find a zip file containing
- Graph.SVG, open that in your browser to view the graph
- Dotfile and edgelist for the qgraph
- A text document and excel sheet that both contain the same information regarding residual stats
- Normal.PNG, a plot showing the distribution of the residuals and testing that distribution for normality (it appears to pass, which coupled with the worst F3 residual being z = 2.01, supposes to me all affinities are adequately accounted for)
To try and summarize the important and/or unexpected takeaways...
The first X node represents Neanderthal ancestry (for BachoKiro_IUP) and Neanderthal and/or damage in BachoKiro_BK1653
ZlatyKun = branches in between basal Eurasians and crown Eurasians, a dead end or a direct ancestor of crown Eurasians?
Goyet_Fournol = a mix of Ust-Ishim and something occupying a similar position to BachoKiro_IUP
'Kostenki-cluster' = a mix of Goyet related ancestry and basal.
ANE = Kostenki-cluster + a generic sort of East-Eurasian (Yana has some Tianyuan on top)
East-Asians (Jomon/Primorsky) = Onge-related lineage + Tianyuan
Near-East = after mixing into the Kostenki-cluster, Basal becomes mixed with the Onge-related lineage that contributes to East-Asians
Georgia_UP = a mixture of the above BE/East-Asian mix and Muierii1
Pinbarbasi = Georgia_UP-like but with 10% WHG
Iran_N = baseline is BE/East-Asian mix, with some ANE and Pinarbasi
CHG = Iran_N but with more Pinarbasi and some EHG
Taforalt = a mix of ANA, proto-Pinarbasi (before the WHG), and 'Levantine Aurignacian', a Goyet-related population that presumably passed through SE Europe 'Balkan Arignacian?', and that also proves crucial in BK1653 and WHG. I do remember reading about a late surivial of Aurignacian technology in Greece, maybe that is related.
WHG = Gravettian + 'Balkan-Aurignacian' + Georgia_UP + ANE
EHG = WHG + Pinarbasi + para-Native-American (UKY, Kolyma, etc.)
Note that in especially the real early branching and in East Eurasians, where we have so few samples, there are multiple phylogenies that work, I just picked the one that made most sense to me.
The following 7 images attempt to illustrate on a map, and through time, what is happening on the graph. Black lines more or less represent regular branching and drift, red and blue lines indicate admixture sources, purple lines indicate the post-admix population. Green lines indicate drift not occuring over distance, but over time - a period of geographic standstill which drift occurred. The colors on the 15kbp slide don't mean much, I got tired and just drew arrows because there are 3 way mixes going on.
The 7 time periods are roughly, 1) pre-40k, 2) post-CI Eruption, 3) 35kbp, 4) 30kbp, 5) LGM-onset, 6) post-LGM, 7) 15kbp
[attachment=109]
[attachment=111]
[attachment=113]
[attachment=115]
[attachment=117]
[attachment=118]
[attachment=120]
[attachment=107]