Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.

Check for new replies
R-U152>L2>Z49>S8183>S22778/S20782
#1
Continuation of this old Anthrogenica thread:
https://genoplot.com/discussions/topic/1...atic-sea/1

In my optimistic intentions, this combined genetic and genealogical map (2024 V3) represents the S22778/S20782 distribution in the mid-1800s (and even a little earlier):

   

Here is the composition of the relevant S22778/S20782 data set:

   
Fredduccine, Mitchell-Atkins, Manofthehour like this post
Reply
#2
Where do you think R-S8183 probably born?
Reply
#3
(04-13-2024, 07:45 AM)asquecco Wrote: Continuation of this old Anthrogenica thread:
https://genoplot.com/discussions/topic/1...atic-sea/1

In my optimistic intentions, this combined genetic and genealogical map (2024 V3) represents the S22778/S20782 distribution in the mid-1800s (and even a little earlier):



Here is the composition of the relevant S22778/S20782 data set:
Here is a map of all known Z49>Z142 samples dated between 530 BC and ~180 AD.  
[Image: txvwjrf.png]

As you can see, the midpoint isn't too far from your Z49>S8183>S22778/S20782 midpoint.

I think we both remember from anthrogenica days (and per your map and piechart above) Z49>S8183 tends to be more German, while Z49>Z142 more French.

EDIT: Just looked at FTDNA discover and there are 114 French and 134 German Z49 samples
S8183 is 39 German, 10 French samples, so almost 4 to 1 ratio
Z142 is 76 French and 60 German samples.

Who knows? Early on, maybe the Rhine served as some kind of initial boundary between the S8183 and Z142 predominate clans.
asquecco, Manofthehour, Fredduccine And 2 others like this post
U152>L2>Z49>Z142>Z150>FGC12381>FGC12378>FGC47869>FGC12401>FGC47875>FGC12384
50% English, 15% Welsh, 15% Scot/Ulster Scot, 5% Irish, 10% German, 2% Scandi, 2% French & Dutch), 1% India
Ancient ~40% Anglo-Saxon, ~40% Briton/Insular Celt, ~15% German, 4% Other Euro
600 AD: 55% Anglo-Saxon (CNE), 45% Pre-Anglo-Saxon Briton (WBI)
“Be more concerned with seeking the truth than winning an argument” 
Reply
#4
(04-13-2024, 02:43 PM)Mitchell-Atkins Wrote:
(04-13-2024, 07:45 AM)asquecco Wrote: Continuation of this old Anthrogenica thread:
https://genoplot.com/discussions/topic/1...atic-sea/1

In my optimistic intentions, this combined genetic and genealogical map (2024 V3) represents the S22778/S20782 distribution in the mid-1800s (and even a little earlier):



Here is the composition of the relevant S22778/S20782 data set:
Here is a map of all known Z49>Z142 samples dated between 530 BC and ~180 AD.  
[Image: txvwjrf.png]

As you can see, the midpoint isn't too far from your Z49>S8183>S22778/S20782 midpoint. 

I think we both remember from anthrogenica days (and per your map and piechart above) Z49>S8183 tends to be more German, while Z49>Z142 more French.

EDIT:  Just looked at FTDNA discover and there are 114 French and 134 German Z49 samples
S8183 is 39 German, 10 French samples, so almost 4 to 1 ratio
Z142 is  76 French and 60 German samples.

Who knows?  Early on, maybe the Rhine served as some kind of initial boundary between the S8183 and Z142 predominate clans.

I think that what these maps are showing is mainly the result of the recent migrations to the Americas.
There many bias in these maps to consider, but certainly there is a core of 'real' meaning in them, perhaps linked to some 'treasure' of the past (salt, copper etc)

   

By the way, I would love S20782's origin near the Z142+ midpoint, because it's close to the 'Lacus Venetus' (Lake Constance).
Mitchell-Atkins, Fredduccine, Manofthehour like this post
Reply
#5
(04-13-2024, 01:17 PM)brunolord15 Wrote: Where do you think R-S8183 probably born?

At the moment I have no clues about S8183's origin.
Reply
#6
(04-17-2024, 04:35 PM)asquecco Wrote:
(04-13-2024, 02:43 PM)Mitchell-Atkins Wrote:
(04-13-2024, 07:45 AM)asquecco Wrote: Continuation of this old Anthrogenica thread:
https://genoplot.com/discussions/topic/1...atic-sea/1

In my optimistic intentions, this combined genetic and genealogical map (2024 V3) represents the S22778/S20782 distribution in the mid-1800s (and even a little earlier):



Here is the composition of the relevant S22778/S20782 data set:
Here is a map of all known Z49>Z142 samples dated between 530 BC and ~180 AD.  
[Image: txvwjrf.png]

As you can see, the midpoint isn't too far from your Z49>S8183>S22778/S20782 midpoint. 

I think we both remember from anthrogenica days (and per your map and piechart above) Z49>S8183 tends to be more German, while Z49>Z142 more French.

EDIT:  Just looked at FTDNA discover and there are 114 French and 134 German Z49 samples
S8183 is 39 German, 10 French samples, so almost 4 to 1 ratio
Z142 is  76 French and 60 German samples.

Who knows?  Early on, maybe the Rhine served as some kind of initial boundary between the S8183 and Z142 predominate clans.

I think that what these maps are showing is mainly the result of the recent migrations to the Americas.
There many bias in these maps to consider, but certainly there is a core of 'real' meaning in them, perhaps linked to some 'treasure' of the past (salt, copper etc)



By the way, I would love S20782's origin near the Z142+ midpoint, because it's close to the 'Lacus Venetus' (Lake Constance).

I've wondered about this potential "Lacus Venetus" connection too. The area plausibly seemed to be a hub of Bronze Age Italo-Celtic activity and dynamics (As well as Rhaetic peoples, and perhaps Proto-Tyrhennians earlier on, etc...)
Fredduccine and Mitchell-Atkins like this post
U152>Z56>Z43>Z46>Z48>Z44>CTS8949>FTC82256 Lindeman
M222...>DF105>ZZ87>S588>S7814 Toner 
Reply
#7
Possible S20782/S22778 dispersal paths around NE Italy.

   
Villanovan, Manofthehour, Fredduccine like this post
Reply
#8
Photo 
A few interesting place names around S20782/S22778 results from NE Italy.

   
Manofthehour and Mitchell-Atkins like this post
Reply

Check for new replies

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)