Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.

Check for new replies
Benghazi Y-DNA chart i made using the data from elmrighni et al + libyaftdna project
#1
I ran all the STR (values? not sure what they are called lol) through the nevgen y haplo predictor + verified a few of the libyans on the ftdna projects' eastern origins, either through last name or from the city they originate from. not sure how to upload images onto here, so feel free to message me for more info regarding anything.

https://imgur.com/a/jxaioio

for those who don't click the link, the results read:

31% E-M81
29.1% J1
14.8% J2
3.9% T
3% R1B-V88 
2% E-M35
2% R1B-M269
1.5 % Q
5.4% E-M2
Ronalawe, Megalophias, Riverman And 1 others like this post
Code:
Target: abceff
Distance: 1.8526% / 0.01852565
39.8    R11759
24.2    Aegean/Anatolian
14.2    HighIBMLowSteppe_Guanche
9.2    Arabian
6.2    SSA
5.0    Samaritan
1.4    Kazakhstan_Kimak.SG

Reply
#2
Some Autosomal results reflecting the potential background of the inhabitants of the city

First profile: relatively low arab, possibly represents a mix of recent western migrants to the city who then mixed with cretans (possibly?) and then the more local arab profiles/population over time. or, this could be the old urban profile of benghazi. not enough information to tell


Target: Libyan_Benghazi_1
Distance: 1.7537% / 0.01753658
50.8 Berber_IA/EMA
28.0 Aegean/Anatolian(780–30BC)
16.8 Arab_Modern
4.4 Yoruba

Target: Libyan_Benghazi_2:K13_Sim
Distance: 1.5497% / 0.01549668
47.2 Berber_IA/EMA
27.2 Aegean/Anatolian(780–30BC)
18.4 Arab_Modern
5.2 Yoruba
2.0 Lebanon_IA

second profile: result from the cyreneican (eastern) hinterland, could possibly represent the pre-western libyan + ottoman/cretan population of benghazi, pretty doubtful but made somewhat more likely given the fate of the luwata who had inhabited the land prior to banu sulaym's arrival + the region's E-M81 clade distributions (largely zenata or houara clades)

Target: Libyan_Tobruk
Distance: 2.3219% / 0.02321874
56.4 Arab_Modern
34.6 Berber_IA/EMA
6.4 Yoruba
2.6 Aegean/Anatolian(780–30BC)
Riverman likes this post
Code:
Target: abceff
Distance: 1.8526% / 0.01852565
39.8    R11759
24.2    Aegean/Anatolian
14.2    HighIBMLowSteppe_Guanche
9.2    Arabian
6.2    SSA
5.0    Samaritan
1.4    Kazakhstan_Kimak.SG

Reply
#3
Do you think these results are quite representative of the average or are there any known sample bias?
Reply
#4
(02-23-2024, 01:41 PM)abceff Wrote: not sure how to upload images onto here, so feel free to message me for more info regarding anything.

Click Go To Full Reply and add the image at the bottom.  Drag and drop is easy. The can be inline or attachments in the post.

   
Reply

Check for new replies

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)