(04-26-2024, 05:21 PM)TanTin Wrote:(04-26-2024, 12:04 PM)Jerome Wrote: Tantin,in the first image satsurblia.sg has a Z score of 0.990 while kotias is reaching 2.11There was a bug with the converted dataset, that I reported in another topic. So I am not sure if these results were from that set with the bug. I have to re-do the test to verify if these are the correct numbers.
Both are lesser than turkey N and slightly lesser than iran_n too.
Does this mean Satsurblia has the least Neanderthal here and most basal?
Also,could you test this same model using Wezmeh,Abdul hosein and hotu?
Tepe guran would be interesting but I guess allentoft isn't merged yet
You did another run on page 4 using v52.2
https://genarchivist.com/showthread.php?...9#pid13779
TanTin Wrote:Dataset used for these f4 stats: v52.2_HO_public
Here it does seem to be different and not as low Z scores that you were getting for satusrblian before(0.8).
Satsurblia is getting 3.1 Z score and Kotias 5.43 Z score now.
But satsurblia is still pretty low relatively to others and even lower than Israel_PPNB/Levant_N and Iberomaurusians?
Is this an artifact of sampling method of satsurblia or is it real?
Could you also redo this and add Wezmeh_N.SG,Hotu and Tepe Abdul hosein samples?
I am trying to see which iranN has highest Neanderthal affinity.
Pinarbasi_Epipaleolithic,Kotias_UP/Dzudzuana and Tepe Guran too maybe,if you have it.