(10-28-2023, 06:23 PM)Rodoorn Wrote:I wouldn't draw too many conclusions as it's not a well thought out model, but when I remove samples that include Saxon, Viking, Norse, and Faroese in their titles from the g25 source, Denmark_IA as the target gets:(10-28-2023, 06:11 PM)Bjørn Wrote: Yes, Anglesqueville, I’ve seen many of your models and can certainly see what they imply. I also realize that they are not necessarily related to the formation of proto-Germanic, but the genetics is invariably discussed and to me lends credence its most likely localization.
Rodoorn, I’m curious how you would model Denmark_IA (which would represent 500BC-~800AD?)?
It's a qadm by Angles and those samples are- from memory- real IA so not early MA.
Add found it: it was IA more specific Roman times:
DNK_Sealand_IA:VK213__AD_389
DNK_Sealand_IA:VK521__AD_300
DNK_Sealand_IA:VK532__AD_100
When my parents are pure Danish IA (dixit Angles), then Angles claim about the need for a LaTene admix fro Anglo-Saxon derived doesn't look plausible to me.
Sweden_IA_2.SG 38.4
Wales_C_EBA 21.6
Sweden_Late_N.SG 17.8
England_MBA_lowEEF 11.2
Czech_IA 11
Up for discussion if these results are relevant (obviously removing all other IA/concurrent/subsequent samples would be more helpful).