(10-28-2023, 06:11 PM)Bjørn Wrote: Yes, Anglesqueville, I’ve seen many of your models and can certainly see what they imply. I also realize that they are not necessarily related to the formation of proto-Germanic, but the genetics is invariably discussed and to me lends credence its most likely localization.
Rodoorn, I’m curious how you would model Denmark_IA (which would represent 500BC-~800AD?)?
It's a qadm by Angles and those samples are- from memory- real IA so not early MA.
Add found it: it was IA more specific Roman times:
DNK_Sealand_IA:VK213__AD_389
DNK_Sealand_IA:VK521__AD_300
DNK_Sealand_IA:VK532__AD_100
When my parents are pure Danish IA (dixit Angles), then Angles' claim about the need for a LaTene admix fro Anglo-Saxon derived doesn't look plausible to me.