Seeing the new results of MH, I thougt portuguese percentage was wrong, but after revising my paper trail, it can make sense, I have a converse jewish line from Portugal. Genetically I don’t know how much levantine could have, only I talk about genealogy in this case, but how we knows, converse lineages after 17th century could be more or less mixed. His name was María Olivera, who belonged to a converse family comed from Portugal in 17th century to Andalusia (Córdoba-Granada), the Olivera family. This jewish portuguese line is paternal. In 18th century this jewish-portuguese line is diluted with other old christian line, and her great grandson married with a woman half converse/half old christian.
I theorize this jewish line could have losed typical sephardic markers, overall for the múltiples mixed marriage, however Rivera line, whom I talked about in other post, they maintain the endogamy until 18th century, then 23andMe could detected this line.
I theorize this jewish line could have losed typical sephardic markers, overall for the múltiples mixed marriage, however Rivera line, whom I talked about in other post, they maintain the endogamy until 18th century, then 23andMe could detected this line.
23andMe: 98.8% Spanish & Portuguese, 0.3% Ashkenazi Jewish, 0.9% Trace Ancestry (0.4% Coptic Egypcian, 0.3% Nigerian, 0.2% Bengali & Northeast Indian).
“The truth doesn’t become more auténtico because whole world agrees with it”. RaMBaM
-M. De la Torre, converse of jew-
-M. Rivera López, converse of jew-
-D. de Castilla, converse of moor-
-M. de Navas, converse of moor-
“The truth doesn’t become more auténtico because whole world agrees with it”. RaMBaM
-M. De la Torre, converse of jew-
-M. Rivera López, converse of jew-
-D. de Castilla, converse of moor-
-M. de Navas, converse of moor-