06-16-2024, 05:36 PM
A slight correction on my comment that I had announced several times in this thread that R-DF27 people were getting the R-L151 assignment with v2. Of course v1 is not going to be as good as v2 since they added SNPs to the ISOGG tree before v2 was created so some of those were added to v2. R-L21 and R-U152 are almost definitely tested in v1 but just like v2 they aren't providing the negative results. DF27, U152, and L21 are the three big subclades of P312. So most R-L151 would actually be R-DF27 if they had tested for Z195 and ZZ12_1 in both v2 and v1.
FF v2 did test for Z195 but not ZZ12_1. So although most R-L151 would actually be R-DF27 if they had tested for and ZZ12_1 they would be derived for ZZ12_1 which is a subclade of R_DF27. I correctly stated that prior to the last comment but writing that comment in rush caused me incorrectly add Z195.
It is extremely doubtful that Z195 is included in FF v1 though. FF was introduced in May 2010 and Z195 wasn't added to the ISOGG tree until 17 August 2012 https://isogg.org/tree/2012/ISOGG_HapgrpR12.html
There should be evidence soon.
FF v2 did test for Z195 but not ZZ12_1. So although most R-L151 would actually be R-DF27 if they had tested for and ZZ12_1 they would be derived for ZZ12_1 which is a subclade of R_DF27. I correctly stated that prior to the last comment but writing that comment in rush caused me incorrectly add Z195.
It is extremely doubtful that Z195 is included in FF v1 though. FF was introduced in May 2010 and Z195 wasn't added to the ISOGG tree until 17 August 2012 https://isogg.org/tree/2012/ISOGG_HapgrpR12.html
There should be evidence soon.