05-26-2024, 04:51 AM
I looked at Armando's MH 2.0 spreadsheet.
Not easy at first since I am rusty working with R1b1 style nomenclature.
There are 115 SNPs under or equivalent to R-M269. 52 of them are M269 equivalents, leaving 63 actually under M269.
17 SNPs are under U106. Mostly different, with a few equivalents.
L48 is tested and is on my pathway. It has nearly half of the men of U106.
I can go one more SNP, known as Z9 at FTDNA but S504/Z28 on this spreadsheet. There are currently over 18,000 men for Z9 on the FTDNA Haplotree, so its still a pretty large group.
By comparison, I would get 9 more levels at 23andMe v5. And 10 more levels from Family Finder, both v2 and v3.
Not easy at first since I am rusty working with R1b1 style nomenclature.
There are 115 SNPs under or equivalent to R-M269. 52 of them are M269 equivalents, leaving 63 actually under M269.
17 SNPs are under U106. Mostly different, with a few equivalents.
L48 is tested and is on my pathway. It has nearly half of the men of U106.
I can go one more SNP, known as Z9 at FTDNA but S504/Z28 on this spreadsheet. There are currently over 18,000 men for Z9 on the FTDNA Haplotree, so its still a pretty large group.
By comparison, I would get 9 more levels at 23andMe v5. And 10 more levels from Family Finder, both v2 and v3.