05-16-2024, 01:59 PM
pretty much the usual
except for G12_A1 who gets a 100% Albania BA/IA (J1a2a1a1~) and G12_S2 who gets 100% wAnatolia Rom/Byz whereas the model for _S3 (J2a1a1a2b1b) as 100% seTurkey Byz actually fails as such (p 0,01); but all others fall into that cline incl both wAnataolia Rom/Byz or seTurkey Byz as source ancestries; other than that G19 has a pull towards Africa/nAfrica (>60% Morocco_LN) and is not incl in the proximal models
at this point in the data i think it is def not possible to get a Roman pop whether in Italy or the Balkan without a major wAnatolia/seTurkey influx and that as early as 0-200 CE (cf Naissus R6769 26-126 calCE)
except for G12_A1 who gets a 100% Albania BA/IA (J1a2a1a1~) and G12_S2 who gets 100% wAnatolia Rom/Byz whereas the model for _S3 (J2a1a1a2b1b) as 100% seTurkey Byz actually fails as such (p 0,01); but all others fall into that cline incl both wAnataolia Rom/Byz or seTurkey Byz as source ancestries; other than that G19 has a pull towards Africa/nAfrica (>60% Morocco_LN) and is not incl in the proximal models
at this point in the data i think it is def not possible to get a Roman pop whether in Italy or the Balkan without a major wAnatolia/seTurkey influx and that as early as 0-200 CE (cf Naissus R6769 26-126 calCE)