Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.

Stolarek et al: Genetic history of East-Central Europe...
now that said paper is out in addendum to the Gepids
the paper did not yield any absolute-dates except for RKO001 who gets an 'Avar period (?)' date

nonetheless the paper reveals

...from RK Sarmatian period individuals that can be modeled as ~100%
Sarm_P_DTI_TT_4_5c and the RK Gepid period individuals that can be modeled as 100% Lon_P_6c
(Extended Data Fig. 8c). This 6th century profile seems to extend also in the Avar period, among the
individuals that don’t carry East Asian ancestry (Extended Data Fig. 8c) and some of them can be
modeled only with Lon_P_north_6c or Lon_P_south

the Longobards at it again (Szolad)
with a score of 100% could it also be that these are actually Longobards (ie s.Scand/Mecklenburg rather than e.Scand) if they indeed fall into the Avar period; stay-behinders or raid victims (cf Warnefrid story); i guess it needs a closer look at that 'Merovingian' assemblege (if its indeed Avar period)

of the Gepid Gep_P badge only RKO001, RKO002, RKF258 and RKF255 have a qpAdm test
the former two both Lon_P_north while the latter RKF255 gets Lon_P_south and RKF258 scores a Venosa_7c exclusive
RKO002 and RKF255 gets some (2.5% and 0.6%) east Asian cf the Gepid VIM_2 (ACD) from ~550 CE Serbia seems to have scored more east Asian in the Baiuvarii paper
Orentil, Moeca, Dewsloth And 3 others like this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Stolarek et al: Genetic history of East-Central Europe... - by alexfritz - 04-24-2024, 11:26 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)