04-13-2024, 12:58 AM
[One more example of a voluntarily blindness. Concerning the Yakutia_LNBA ancestry and the Uralic language, a commentator wrote:]
“Your view is ignoring when the DNA and the language overlay perfectly.”
You got that one wrong, too: there is no perfect overlay. There is only one Uralic-speaking population – the Nganasans – which consists mostly of the Yakutia ancestry, and it is more similar to non-Uralic populations (Dolgans and Tundra Yukaghirs) than to the other Uralic or even to the other Samoyedic populations.
Moreover, the linguistic results show that it is impossible that Proto-Uralic was ever spoken in Yakutia. And as you should know, you cannot see the language from the DNA, because language is not inherited genetically. So, make your math: clearly the Nganasans are the aberrant population here, one of the farthest ones from the Proto-Uralic population.
[Perfect overlay/lap? When it is actually just the opposite.]
“Your view is ignoring when the DNA and the language overlay perfectly.”
You got that one wrong, too: there is no perfect overlay. There is only one Uralic-speaking population – the Nganasans – which consists mostly of the Yakutia ancestry, and it is more similar to non-Uralic populations (Dolgans and Tundra Yukaghirs) than to the other Uralic or even to the other Samoyedic populations.
Moreover, the linguistic results show that it is impossible that Proto-Uralic was ever spoken in Yakutia. And as you should know, you cannot see the language from the DNA, because language is not inherited genetically. So, make your math: clearly the Nganasans are the aberrant population here, one of the farthest ones from the Proto-Uralic population.
[Perfect overlay/lap? When it is actually just the opposite.]
~ Per aspera ad hominem ~
Y-DNA: N-Z1936 >> CTS8565 >> BY22114 (Savonian)
mtDNA: H5a1e (Northern Fennoscandian)