(03-20-2024, 04:28 PM)Manofthehour Wrote: A genetics paper on the Picenes was done in years past, which reported on Mtdna and excluded Y-dna. This might explain why the Mtdna placements are more refined, perhaps being the same samples from that paper.
I just hope they are able to refine the Y-dna placements at some point?
Antonio 2019 paper had Ydna percentages for the picenes
62.5% was R1b
6.5% was I2a
I cannot recall others , but I think it was J2 and a minor I1
********************
Maternal side yDna branch is R1b - S8172
Paternal Grandfather mother's line is I1- Z131 - A9804
Veneto 75.8%, Austria 5%, Saarland 3.4%, Friuli 3.2%, Trentino 2.6%, Donau Schwaben 1%, Marche 0.8%
BC Ancient Sites I am connected to, Wels Austria, Sipar Istria and Gissa Dalmatia
Maternal side yDna branch is R1b - S8172
Paternal Grandfather mother's line is I1- Z131 - A9804
Veneto 75.8%, Austria 5%, Saarland 3.4%, Friuli 3.2%, Trentino 2.6%, Donau Schwaben 1%, Marche 0.8%
BC Ancient Sites I am connected to, Wels Austria, Sipar Istria and Gissa Dalmatia