03-12-2024, 05:48 PM
(03-12-2024, 01:09 PM)Pribislav Wrote: It seems we could be talking about a patrilineal dynasty as well, since samples from three different sites could belong to the same subclade (the last two have lower coverage):
LWB003; G2a2b-L497>Z1815>Y7538>Z1816>Z1823>Z726>CTS4803>S2808>Y3098 (xFGC8346,Z40765,Z45548,FT47568,FT153446,BY34320,FGC34822,Y97811)
MBG017; G2a2b-L497>Z1815>Y7538>Z1816>Z1823>Z726>CTS4803>S2808>Y3098 (xY3101,S2795,FGC8346,Z45548,FT153446,FTD7424,BY34320,BY130701,Z30742,FGC34822,Y97811,FT367097)
HOC002; G2a2b-L497>Z1815>Y7538>Z1816>Z1823>Z726>CTS4803
HOC003; G2a2b-L497>Z1815>Y7538>Z1816
Could be seen as another example of top elites DO NOT have disproportional genetic success necessarily. The elites on top were sometimes particularly vulnerable and the late Hallstatt elite might even have been dethroned, probably even been under attack at the end of the period.
Most of the big founder events are clan-tribal based, not because of single, exceptionally successful individuals.
There is no full yDNA lists for all the samples available yet?