03-05-2024, 08:39 PM
(03-03-2024, 09:31 PM)Tomenable Wrote: What this paper claims, has it been confirmed by other more recent studies?:
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1211927110
I'm not seeing it. Whether it was more Denisovan or just drift or some other admixture in their Papuans, or ancient population structure or just recent admixture in their Australians, I would consider those before suggesting gene flow straight from India. Actually, in the supplements you can see in the frappe run from K=5 two of their Australians are European mixed with very little Indian component in only one of them.
Code:
pop1 pop2 pop3 pop4 est se z p n
<chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 Australian.DG Papuan.DG India_Ro~ Yorub~ 2.32e-4 1.86e-4 1.24 0.214 9.98e5
2 Australian.DG Papuan.DG Brahmin.~ Yorub~ 1.47e-4 2.33e-4 0.631 0.528 1.12e6
3 Australian.DG Papuan.DG Irula.DG Yorub~ 2.49e-4 2.40e-4 1.04 0.300 1.12e6
4 Australian.DG Papuan.DG ITU.DG Yorub~ 3.41e-5 1.91e-4 0.178 0.859 8.38e5
5 Australian.DG Papuan.DG Indian_G~ Yorub~ -1.48e-5 3.11e-4 -0.0477 0.962 1.10e6