02-12-2024, 04:01 PM
(02-12-2024, 02:16 PM)jdean Wrote:(02-12-2024, 01:38 PM)Rodoorn Wrote:(02-12-2024, 01:15 PM)jdean Wrote:(02-12-2024, 12:17 PM)Rodoorn Wrote: Yes indeed we disagree. But that doesn't mean:
a. you are per definition right, which implicates "please, try hard to understand" or "misunderstand". I can understand and at the same time disagree. How much space is there to disagree with you?
but you aren't really arguing with Jaska, you are arguing against an entire discipline that stretches back into the 18th C.
Historical linguistics
Ok you make it a bit over the top jdean....
It are just some observations of a humble historian.
Admitted that branche is already somewhat older
But we aren't arguing against history, hows about maths (likely a study as old as history), what's the probability your concerns of the last couple of days trumps theory over 200 yrs old ?
You have to improve your sidekick remarks jdean