Seeing language from the DNA

[ph2ter]

Ph2ter:

Tell me your Y-DNA and I will with a great probabilty (or at least with more than 50%) tell you your possible mother languages and the ones which most certainly aren't yours.

When I tell you my Y-DNA terminal mutation, you can even tell that my forefather N-BY22114 some 650 years ago was already Häkkinen by his family name and spoke a dialect of ancient Karelian, which later evolved to the Savonian dialect of Finnish language. But beyond the horizon of the genealogical research, it comes increasingly more uncertain to tell the language, the further in time we go.

There the only reliable method is to look at the results of historical linguistics and see if there is a match concerning time, place, and direction of expansion. With this scientific method we know that e.g. the N-men in the Bronze Age Kola BOO were not Uralic speakers: it took yet almost two more millennia before the first Uralic (Saami) speakers arrived there from the south. There the Saami languages replaced older Paleo-European languages.

Furthermore, there were not yet Uralic speakers anywhere near the region from where the North Siberian migration to Kola originated ca. 2000 BCE, because at that time the Uralic languages were still spoken in the narrow homeland around the Central Ural Region.

Now, there are people who ignore this scientific method and these results of historical linguistics, because they believe that they can predict language from the DNA. In their deep ignorance they honestly believe that because the BOO people had N-CTS3103, they must have spoken a Uralic language.

In which group do you belong? In the scientific group or in the cult of language-gene worshippers?


Ph2ter:

But we have the methods to calculate how old is any of the clades. Y-DNA continuously mutates and creates time markers. We can exclude the clades that are dated earlier than some point in time.
So, I don't understand your doubts. You can easily exclude the Yukaghir languages by looking the age of their clades or by looking the age of common TMRCA and then inspect if that fits with your theory of the age of the proto language in question.

Which doubts you do not understand and why?
Please go through the process by which you can easily exclude the Yukaghiric language family.

Any correlations of autosomal ancestry with uniparental haplogroups are coincidental, because there is no interdependency between the autosomal and uniparental levels.

N-BY22114 has links with Finns, next with ancient Minino in Russia, then common clades with Hungarian conquerors, then Krasnoyarsk ancient samples and then Zabaykalsky kray. Pretty neat direction, I would say.
BOO CTS3103 parted from your line according to yfull about 3000 BCE. Also, more detailed haplo of BOO people is not known (at least to me because I was never interested to go deeply into this Bolshoy thing). Obviously they have split before Proto-Uralic formed (if you know that they certainly didn't speak some related language).
I don't belong to any of the groups made in your head.
And I don't know the haplos of Yukaghir people. Never researched that.